Abstract:
This project presents a concept for a redesigned interactive infographic based on rulings from Meta’s Oversight Board, often referred to as Facebook’s “Supreme Court.” The original chart was exploratory and bubble-based, offering some interactivity but ultimately lacking clarity and structure. This redesign reimagines the information as a layered, data-forward visualization that brings case outcomes and media attention to the forefront. Key features include a waterfall area chart showing media coverage over time, filterable categories of violations, and stacked bars indicating the proportion of cases upheld versus overturned. The result is a more intuitive visual experience that helps users identify patterns at a glance.

Purpose:
The original infographic presented major Oversight Board rulings through overlapping, vertically arranged bubbles of varying sizes. While interactive, the chart trivialized serious cases (e.g., hate speech, graphic violence) through playful visuals, and important storytelling elements—such as the timeline—were easily overlooked. In redesigning the graphic, I aimed to preserve the original focus on media attention, case categories, and outcomes while improving access to the full timeline and clarifying the amount of attention each category received. The new format introduces structure without sacrificing interactivity, making it easier for users to quickly compare and interpret case types, decisions, and visibility.

Background:
The Meta Oversight Board was created to make high-stakes decisions on Facebook and Instagram content, often involving politically sensitive, controversial, or globally impactful posts. These decisions set precedents that ripple across all social media platforms, influencing how other tech companies approach moderation and policy enforcement. The infographic’s new title, Riding the Content Oversight Wave, reflects the broader role that media scrutiny and high-profile decisions play in shaping online governance. By visualizing how attention builds around certain rulings, the graphic invites reflection on how public and institutional awareness evolve.

Results & Next Steps:
This design concept was partially developed into a working prototype focused on two categories: Hate Speech and Dangerous Individuals & Organizations. These interactive panels feature filters, hover states, clickable case names, and responsive tooltips that allow users to explore case-level detail and media attention over time. The next step is to expand this functionality across the remaining categories and refine layout responsiveness. Future iterations could incorporate search, mobile views, and user testing to validate accessibility and improve overall engagement.

Skills Developed:
This project sharpened my approach to visual hierarchy, accessibility, and narrative-driven design. I practiced translating critique into action, balancing creative storytelling with clarity, and transforming a creative infographic into a more data-driven and user-guided experience.

Tools Used:
Adobe Illustrator, Figma, Tableau